You may get the impression so far, due to my emphasis, that my only real concern is the polar-left non-normie. That is not true.

Polar-right non-normies are just as dangerous, when in power. They are often hyper-religious people who think they speak on behalf of God, Himself. Some think they are a god. Sometimes they are skin heads. But, regardless of that, they are always power fanatics, and they hate all races, religions and cultures that are different from their own. But, contrary to the racist nonsense promoted by polar-left non-normies, polar-right non-normies come in all races and creeds too, not just white Nazis.

The reason why I don' t stress polar-right on this web/blog site, however, is because it is not in power and, in all likelihood, it won' t be for some time. The reason is simple. Polar-left non-normies have so impugned polar-right that they have been castigated out of our political system and confined to the fringes of society. Those polar-right non-normies who join the KKK, lynch minorities, kill abortion doctors, bomb government buildings, form militias to fight against the feds, favor the Nazi party and refuse to pay their income taxes have been marginalized and are totally unwelcome anywhere in mainstream.

Unfortunately, as a result of successfully demonizing and marginalizing polar-right, polar-left was welcomed with open arms into the normie liberal movement. Once this happened, polar-left started taking over the liberal cause (as polar non-normies always do). And remember, polar-left and polar-right are the exact same people who have merely chosen to attach their hot spots (and resulting conflagration areas) to different symbols.

There is a major difference between the terms liberal and liberalism. Why is this important to understand? Because you must identify your enemy first before you fight him.

Liberal is a term indicating progressive and free thinking.

It was certainly a characteristic of our founding fathers because, at the time, the system of government that they designed had never been created before. They had to be free thinking. Had they been conservatives, we would have copied something already in existence.

Liberalism is a polar-left anti-capitalist philosophy.

This philosophy of the polar-left non-normies is based on serving the driven dysfunctional psychological anti-capitalistic symbols that reside in the psyches of polar-left non-normie members.

These polar-left promoters of liberalism are neither liberal nor progressive, in the classic sense, even though they often refer to themselves as such. They are non-normie control-freaks who are pretending to be liberal in order to advance their polar-left anti-capitalist agenda.

Today, unfortunately, polar-left dominates the Democrat Party and these non-normies have pushed their own normie liberals to the side, where they can' t be heard. This is sad because normie Democrats are the only people capable of saving the party from its eventual self-destruction.

Given total control, polar-left will one day take the entire party down with them. Unless they are identified and driven out of the party soon, by normie Democrats (like Zell Miller), they will eventually allow the Republicans to assume a permanent majority status.

To some conservatives, that might seem like a good idea. But, no truer words were spoken than those that stated:

Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

It' s only the threat of the loss of power, to a watchful opposition, that keeps any party uncorrupted.

If, however, the Democrats continue down this polar-left non-normie path, the party will assuredly self-destruct, ceasing to be a threat to Republicans and only becoming a noise.

Remember, you can identify the polars quickly by their attack mechanisms. The polars seldom defend because they cannot defend the indefensible lack of logic that they base their beliefs on. Therefore, attack is their only means of defense.

The symbolic attachments of polar-left.

It is important to recognize some of the more common areas where polar-left non-normies have attached their symbols and why.

Polar-left non-normies are socialistic (sometimes communistic) because of their driven issue of fairness. Life is inherently not fair, but non-normies want to re-write life to produce fairness for all. Why is that? Frankly, it' s because of their history. Somewhere, back in their youth, they rebelled against life because they thought that it was being unfair to them. Their lack of grieving these (perceived) losses created hot spots in their psyches. Later they attached their hot spots to the symbol of fairness, which produced a driven need to protect all the psychological losers of this world (like them) by controlling life itself.

There is a difference between an underdog and a loser. In the film "Rocky," Rocky was an underdog, and we all cheered for him because he fought fairly against incredible odds to win.

Polar-left looks upon any system, where competition is involved, as being unfair to the loser, like in capitalism. Why do they identify so much with this loser? Simple. Because it's them. No matter how rich they are, they are psychological losers and now, through projection, they enter into a dysfunctional empathy for all losers, because they have become psychologically one with losers (individuals or groups) in society--other than polar-right losers, of course.

There are no greater losers in society than the homeless. Now we all know that the vast majority of the homeless (other than the mentally ill) are either bums that don't want to work or addicts. But you are cruel if you point that out. Polar-left non-normies, therefore, attack you, the hardworking normie, if you even hint this fact, because they have become one with the homeless. So your attack against the homeless is an attack against them, personally.

A common behavior of polar-left non-normies, when protecting the losers that they have become one with, is to come up with a euphemism (a more palatable name for them). After all, once their symbols made them one with the loser, they don't want to be called something despicable themselves.

The "homeless" used to be called vagrants, bums, beggars, derelicts, hobos, tramps, moochers, panhandlers, cadgers, scroungers and the shiftless. Notice that all these terms described, derogatorily and precisely, who and what they were.

The psychological loser polar-left was successful in renaming them by a term that only described their situation, "homeless," thus removing all fault from them for causing it themselves. Clever, huh? I told you, non-normies are not stupid, only driven.

This is also why you'll see the psychological loser polar-left non-normies doing all night vigils to save a convicted murderer from being executed by the State. The convict is another loser that they have to defend because of their driven need for fairness. Losers, like they are, have to be protected. Their symbols made them one with this loser.

You'll observe the psychological loser polar-left non-normie animal rights activists breaking into laboratories that do experiments on animals. Even though these experiments save human life, loser polar-left symbols are attached to animals, not humans. They look upon animals as being the losers in the world because we eat them, we make furs out of them and we use them for work and entertainment. In fact, due to those symbols, polar-left non-normies prefer animals to humans. Therefore, they have become one with animals and, as such, think that they feel their pain. No, they can't. It's merely the dysfunctional empathy, that is a bi-product of their symbolism, that makes them think that they can feel an animal's pain.

You will see non-normie teachers eliminating competitive sports on the playground. "It's just not fair to the loser that someone wins." (Response) "No. It's only that it brings you pain when you observe a loser because you, the psychological loser polar-left teachers identify only with losers instead of winners. Your symbols have made you become one with the loser."

If this polar-left type teaching philosophy becomes dominant in education, our country will only produce losers because they will be the only ones rewarded for their loser status.

It's also why psychological loser polar-left attorneys will break their necks to get a guilty person off on a technicality. These polar-left non-normie attorneys have attached their symbols to losers, too, and now they are driven to exonerate these dredges of society (to our detriment). Their symbols have become one with the losers they represent.

These same polar-left non-normie attorneys are also responsible for the elimination, over the years, of vagrancy laws that used to protect normies from the adverse affects of non-normie derelicts invading and taking over the streets and parks of their cities. They are also the dysfunctional reason for the mentally ill being released onto the streets, from the hospitals where they used to be treated and cared for. Now these poor souls wander the cities in a mental fog, accosting normies on their way to and from work and are called "homeless" by polar-left. "Polar-left, you created them!"

Illegal aliens are losers in the eyes of the psychological loser polar-left non-normies because these migrants came from poor countries. Therefore, any attempt to round them up, or seriously block their ability to cross the border, causes the symbols of these polar-left non-normies to clang like a fire bell. It makes no difference if many of these are criminals, or if some are terrorists. Polar-left non-normies are one with them, and that's all that matters. That's why, again, they came up with another euphemism for them: "undocumented workers."

The effect of polar-left non-normieness on the country

Non-normie symbolism is the reason why polar-left politicians and causeaholic activists oppose virtually everything that the United States does to benefit itself. After all, capitalism is bad because it is unfair to some. Their symbols have become one with all losers in the capitalistic system. Since America is the king of capitalism, it is evil. Therefore, it must be stopped, reduced in strength and controlled by collectives of other loser nations like France. This is why polar-left loves the United Nations. The U.N. has demonstrated, repeatedly, that it wants the influence of America diminished, too (without decreasing its monetary support, of course).

As such, polar-left blocks every issue that is in the interest of capitalism (The United States), such as expanding nuclear energy facilities, building more refineries to process the increasing energy demand, expanding the drilling for oil in Alaska, waging war against its aggressive enemies, exporting American business and industry abroad.

They do it for all the (supposedly) right reasons, of course. They claim, "We can't use nuclear energy because it's dangerous, we can't build more refineries or drill in Alaska because it would endanger the environment, we can't wage war unilaterally because we are too powerful and we'll upset other countries, and we can't export our businesses or industry because we would be profiteering off cheap labor."

These are but a few of the multitudinous polar-left anti- capitalistic non-normie issues, but some of the more visible ones.

Why polar-left non-normies have to hide their true selves.

Let me now tell you the fundamental reason why polar-left does all this. First, they can never admit their own evil polar nature to you or, more especially, to themselves. So everything that they do must be couched in the framework of an altruistic explanation. They try to convince the world that they are good, since their positive symbols are attached to losers and, therefore, the rest of us are evil (by inference).

The truth, on the other hand, is quite the opposite. They want the destruction of our country or, more specifically, the complete annihilation of capitalism. Can you imagine a person saying, "I love my country," and at the same time, seeking it's destruction? Only polar-left has this capacity. (Polar-right doesn't, because it is more polar jingoistic). This is why polar-left is so anti-military. The armed forces protect capitalism.

What about the rich? They aren't losers. Why are so many of them polar-left? Anytime a polar-left non-normie loser becomes rich, like through genes (inheritance), a break (Hollywood star) or by chance business success, the symbols that they had attached to fairness tends to counter-react against their good fortune. This produces an enormous psychological guilt bubble within them. In fact, this festering guilt abscess eventually grows even larger and stronger than the original loser symbol itself, if not dealt with. Therefore, it has to be satisfied or it will turn the non-normie into a psychological basket-case. As such, their driven nature goes into hyper-drive to resolve this internal quagmire.

Naturally, they could just give away all their money. Wouldn't that solve the psychological problem? Yes, but there is a difficulty with that solution. As I instructed you before, polar-left non-normies are extremely selfish. Therefore, they can't give away very much of what they possess.

So, how do they solve this dichotomy? By campaigning for everyone to contribute socialistically, through taxation, to their cause to help the down-trodden, of course. This way the issue gets solved, and they get to keep most of their money. You see, they don't mind paying a little more in taxes because, since they are rich, it will mean that they will give up only a little bit of their wealth. Also, they now get to take credit for helping the losers, which decreases the size of the guilt bubble that has been growing inside their psyches. Now they can accomplish both. They can placate their guilt and still stay rich.

Deep down, however, they know the truth about themselves. So they push that truth down further inside their psyches, where they can try to ignore it. This process creates in them an arrogant persona that says, "I'm better than you are." This driven need to convince themselves of their own goodness, however, forces them to heap disdain on the normies who oppose them. Therefore, they insult normies with accusations like, "You are uncaring and unfeeling monsters." In other words, they accuse the normies of what they, themselves, are guilty of. This is the ultimate form of denial, exceeding even that of the practicing alcoholic.

It's also easy to prove. Wherever polar-left is dominant in the country, per capita donations to charity are significantly lower than in the rest of the normie communities. This tells you who they really are, despite their claims: "We care more."

How did this happen?

All this didn't occur suddenly. It took years. Non-normies instituted subtle non-normie changes in policy, law or procedure incrementally over the past fifty+ years. But then few recognized who these polar-left non-normies were. At one time most people thought that they were just people who were more passionate about their issues than others. Not true.

Normies are passionate.

Non-normies are driven.

Now, normies are forced to respond to these years of non-normie legislation, procedures and structures by undoing them, one by one.

In the section "Combating non-normieness," I give you the five steps to follow that will allow you, the normie, to take back everything that you have lost. But you must start from the ground up. How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time. Below are the ground floor issues that polar-left non-normies started with. You must do likewise to begin the process.

1. Run identified normies for elective office.

   From the ground up, defeat non-normie politicians and replace them with normie politicians, who identify themselves as being normie and test out accordingly.

2. Then reinstate vagrancy laws and their enforcement.

   This is the easiest one to do quickly, once you have a sufficient number of normies in local office, because it is a local issue. This is where you (the normie) have the greatest power and the most profound opportunity to defeat non-normies.

   You may have to impeach a non-normie judge, however, after he or she tries to block you from doing this. But don't hesitate. It will send a message to other non-normie judges not to mess with you.

3. Finally, take back the schools.

   Run normie candidates for every school board. Then bring normie solutions back into your schools and identify them as such.

   Once you have control, get rid of all the non-normie curriculum. If any principal objects, get rid of him or her. This will send a stark message to the non-normie teachers who don't climb aboard.

   Your schools have been completely taken over by non-normies, in the departments of education and in the teachers union. Normie teachers have been leaving, or not entering, education in such large numbers that, today, most of the public school teachers are also non-normie. It will take years to undue all this dysfunction. But start eating the elephant now.

Let's say you accomplish, or make great inroads into solving the three items above. You may ask, what about the national picture? Won't non-normies still be running rampant all over our country?

I assure you that they won't. Any groundswell that produces achievements like what I just described, in many communities, influences the entire country.

No one looks at the results of local politics more than politicians. After all, other than the presidency, all politics are local. Success like what I'm talking about will vibrate throughout the land.

You'll see budding normie candidates coming out of the woodwork, just to serve, because now they'll feel like they can accomplish something. And they'll be courageous. Nothing gains more bandwagon participants than a revolution that looks like it might be successful. You may even find normies running as a slate under the Republican or Democrat masthead. And remember, normies have been waiting for this to happen, for a long, long time.

Other non-normie issues facing normies.

If I made a list of every non-normie issue, that had to be tackled by normies, I could add another twenty pages to this section. Worse yet, it would probably scare you so bad that you'd be afraid to start anything. The beautiful part, however, is that so much of the other stuff will take care of itself when the normie revolution begins.

Just look at what happened after Rush Limbaugh came on the scene in the late nineteen-eighties. At first he was attacked viciously by polar-left. But he survived, as truth always does. Then he, almost single handedly, changed the entire complexion of the political landscape.

Rush, himself, didn't lead a movement. He only inspired, guided and instructed those who did. But there is one thing about his approach that might limit his success. He describes himself as being on the right and his opponents as being on the left. This is fine for talk radio, but it could be a fallacy in politics.

The effect of speaking in terms of right and left infers to the public that truth lies somewhere in the middle, between the two--left and right. This gives rise to those on the non-normie left disguising themselves as moderates, in the attempt to send a message to the electorate that they sit in the middle, in the seat of truth. Truth does, in fact, lie in the middle between the two polars. But not where vacillators (moderates) sit.

Rush Limbaugh claims to be on the political right, but he does not sit to the right of truth. He usually sits right in the middle of it, with polar-left and polar-right to his far-left and far-right. Vacillating moderates (cowardly non-normies), in the meantime, are somewhere in outer space waiting for some poll to determine how they will stand on a given issue.

But the greater voting public often sees neither the right-wing or the left-wing as being the absolute purveyors of truth. They see themselves as the decipherers of truth, and they look to the arguments of the left and right to determine it.

Ergo, the term normie. It indicates a person who is normal and non-driven. Thus normies are honest by nature and, therefore, trustworthy. They do what they say they are going to do, with no internal hot spots or psychological symbols compelling them to act otherwise.

Another problem that Rush Limbaugh has struggled with is the "why?" of the "extreme lefties" that he opposes. Time after time his (normie) callers ask him, "Why are they like this?," "Why can't they understand pure logic?," and "Why can't they hear me?"

This is no criticism of Rush. He has no personal background like I have that has exposed him to the huge laboratory of non-normies in Alcoholics Anonymous and Al-Anon (only a brief stay in a clinic for prescription drug addiction). In A.A., giant pools of non-normies, on both polars, reside. If he had my history, I assure you that he would have figured this out long before I did.

After all, I tested Rush. By my exam, he scores about 10%, which is completely normie. Therefore, this Web/Blog site fills in the gap in Rush's explanations and, hopefully, gives normies the tools that they've been lacking to take back their country. It also gives Rush an answer to his "Why?" question.

What I aim to accomplish with this Web/Blog site is to show normies that they, in fact, usually do sit in the seat of truth, and not to the right or left of it. What they need to look for is neither left-wing or right-wing candidates. There is too much danger of accidently choosing a polar non-normie.

Instead they need to look for the normie candidate in either party. Right now normies are beginning to win many of the elections, but not the majority. What I want to see is more normies emerging, especially in the Democrat Party, without losing the existing elected normies who are primarily serving in the Republican Party. Only a few are left in the Democrat Party.

This flushing out of non-normies, in both parties, produces a healthy government--one that will stand longer than the Roman Empire. After all, it was the non-normies that brought down that domain. How do I know that? Because it collapsed from within!

top